Your world, exposed.

Welcome to Santa's Naughty List

The list is real. The coal is earned. Every day, Santa's elves scan headlines from around the world, looking for people in power who lie, cheat, steal, oppress, exploit, or otherwise disgrace the public trust. When they find something naughty, it gets recorded — publicly, permanently, and with sources. This is the North Pole's official ledger of political wrongdoing. No ads. No corporate sponsors. Just raw accountability powered by elves, AI, and a disgust for corruption.

📋 All🔴 Authoritarianism🟠 Corruption & Ethics🟡 Voter Suppression🟢 Civil Rights Violations🔵 Extremist Connections
about 7 hours ago

The Justice Department seeks voter and election information from at ...

The Justice Department's pursuit of voter and election information raises alarms about potential election interference. This aggressive move could threaten the integrity of democratic processes and spark further distrust among voters.

about 7 hours ago

The Justice Department seeks voter and election information from at ...

The Justice Department's alarming request for voter and election information raises serious concerns about potential election interference. This move could threaten the integrity of the electoral process and undermine public trust in democratic institutions.

about 15 hours ago

Texas Democrats leave the state to prevent quorum needed to vote ...

Texas Democrats have fled the state to block a quorum necessary for voting on restrictive measures, raising alarms about the lengths to which lawmakers will go to protect voting rights. This dramatic move underscores the escalating battle over access to the ballot in the Lone Star State.

about 15 hours ago

Texas Democrats leave the state to prevent vote on GOP-drawn ...

Texas Democrats have fled the state to block a vote on controversial GOP-drawn redistricting, raising alarms about election interference and the erosion of democratic processes. This bold move underscores the escalating battle over voting rights in Texas.

1 day ago

US Supreme Court poised to assess validity of key voting rights law

The US Supreme Court is set to challenge the integrity of the Voting Rights Act, a landmark law designed to eliminate racial discrimination in voting. This potential move raises urgent concerns about the future of equitable access to the ballot box and the protection of democratic rights.

1 day ago

Texas State House Panel Advances Gerrymandered Congressional ...

A Texas State House panel has advanced a gerrymandered congressional map, undermining fair representation and threatening the integrity of the electoral process. This move raises serious concerns about voter suppression and the manipulation of district boundaries for political gain.

1 day ago

Supreme Court tees up Louisiana redistricting case that could ...

Louisiana's redistricting process faces scrutiny as civil rights advocates warn of potential violations of the Voting Rights Act, threatening fair representation for Black voters. The Supreme Court's decision could set a critical precedent for voting rights nationwide.

1 day ago

Redrawn Texas congressional map advances as Republicans look ...

Texas Republicans advance a controversial redrawn congressional map, raising alarms over potential gerrymandering that could dilute voter representation. This move threatens to entrench partisan power and undermine fair electoral processes in the state.

2 days ago

Democrats say a GOP plan to redraw House districts in Texas harms ...

Texas Republicans are accused of redrawing House districts to undermine Black and Hispanic voters, raising alarms about potential violations of the Voting Rights Act. This controversial move threatens to dilute minority representation and could reshape the political landscape in the state.

2 days ago

DOJ investigates voter rolls for noncitizens under new Trump order ...

The Trump administration's directive to investigate voter rolls for noncitizens raises alarms over potential voter suppression tactics. Critics argue this move could disenfranchise legitimate voters, threatening the integrity of democratic participation.

4 days ago

Texas Republicans unveil congressional map that could gift them ...

Texas Republicans have unveiled a controversial congressional redistricting map that critics argue intentionally suppresses Black and Latino voters. This move raises alarms about fair representation and the integrity of the electoral process in the state.

4 days ago

New Texas redistricting plan could achieve Trump's aims : NPR

A proposed redistricting plan in Texas threatens to undermine the Voting Rights Act, strategically benefiting a single political party. This move raises alarms about voter suppression and the integrity of democratic processes in the state.

4 days ago

Justice department asked California to give details of non-citizens ...

The Justice Department's shift towards hunting for voter fraud raises alarms about its commitment to upholding voting laws. This focus on non-citizen voter investigations threatens to undermine electoral integrity and access, potentially disenfranchising legitimate voters in California.

8 days ago

The GOP is ready for a new redistricting war. Democrats are ...

Gerrymandering efforts are set to reshape electoral maps, threatening fair representation as the GOP gears up for a new redistricting battle. This strategic maneuver could undermine democratic processes and entrench partisan power, raising alarms for voters nationwide.

8 days ago

At Redistricting Hearing, Texas Democrats Attack Silent Republicans

Trump's push for Texas Republicans to gerrymander electoral maps could secure five additional seats for his party, raising alarms about voter suppression tactics. This maneuver threatens fair representation and underscores the lengths to which political leaders will go to entrench power.

9 days ago

Election Officials Allege Possible Voter Fraud in Republican Primary ...

Election officials are sounding the alarm over potential ballot stuffing in a City Council race, prompting the New York City Board of Elections to request a criminal investigation. This alarming development raises serious questions about the integrity of the electoral process and voter trust.

9 days ago

Democrats rally in Texas over Trump order to redraw districts: 'The ...

Trump's controversial order to redraw Texas voting districts has sparked fierce protests from Democrats and voting rights activists. Critics warn this move threatens fair representation and could disenfranchise countless voters, igniting a critical battle over electoral integrity in the state.

10 days ago

National Urban League says Trump's policies amount to emergency ...

Trump's policies are being labeled as a national emergency by the National Urban League, citing widespread voter suppression tactics that threaten access to the ballot box. This alarming trend raises serious questions about the integrity of democratic processes in the United States.

10 days ago

3 Supreme Court justices just tried to kill the ban on racist election ...

Three Supreme Court justices have moved to dismantle a crucial provision of the Voting Rights Act, threatening to eliminate preclearance for states with a history of discriminatory practices. This alarming shift could pave the way for new laws that undermine fair access to the ballot box.

10 days ago

Supreme Court blocks rule that blocks Voting Rights Act for now

Redistricting in North Dakota has led to a troubling first: no Native American candidates are represented in the state legislature for the first time in 35 years. This significant shift raises alarms about voter suppression and the erosion of minority representation in politics.

about 2 months ago

Voter Suppression

Donald Trump

PresidentUS Government

On June 11, 2025, Donald Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) made a sweeping and concerning demand for election data from the state of Colorado. This action is part of a broader pattern of behavior that raises significant concerns about voter suppression and the undermining of electoral integrity.

Detailed Analysis: The Trump DOJ's demand for Colorado election data is a significant move that aligns with previous efforts to cast doubt on the integrity of U.S. elections. This demand is particularly troubling given its connection to persistent false claims about election fraud, which have been a recurring theme in Trump's political narrative. The request for data appears to be an attempt to substantiate these unfounded claims, which have been repeatedly debunked by numerous investigations and audits.

This action is classified as voter suppression because it could intimidate voters and election officials, potentially discouraging participation in future elections. The DOJ's approach suggests an authoritarian tactic, leveraging federal power to interfere with state-managed election processes. Such interference undermines the decentralized nature of U.S. elections, which is a critical safeguard against manipulation and abuse.

The broader political landscape is impacted by these actions as they contribute to a climate of distrust and fear surrounding elections. By perpetuating false narratives about election fraud, the Trump administration risks eroding public confidence in democratic institutions. This erosion is particularly dangerous as it can lead to decreased voter turnout and increased polarization, further destabilizing the political environment.

Why This Matters: The implications of the Trump DOJ's actions are profound. If left unchecked, these demands for election data could set a precedent for federal overreach into state election affairs, threatening the autonomy of state governments. This could lead to a chilling effect on voter participation, as citizens may fear that their personal information could be misused or weaponized for political purposes.

Moreover, the continued propagation of false election fraud claims undermines democratic norms and the principle of free and fair elections. Public trust in the electoral process is essential for the functioning of democracy, and actions that diminish this trust can have long-lasting negative effects on governance and civil society.

Key Concerning Actions: - The Trump DOJ's sweeping demand for Colorado election data. - The perpetuation of false claims about election fraud. - Potential voter suppression through intimidation and federal overreach. - Undermining public confidence in the integrity of elections.

2 months ago

Voter Suppression

Donald Trump

PresidentUS Government

On June 3, 2025, Donald Trump was involved in a significant incident concerning voter suppression. A judge dismissed a Democratic Party challenge to an order issued by Trump, which was perceived to impact voting systems in a manner that suppresses voter turnout. This action is part of a broader pattern of behavior aimed at undermining electoral integrity and promoting unfounded claims of election fraud.

Detailed Analysis: The incident revolves around an order from Donald Trump that allegedly affects voting systems, with the intent to suppress voter turnout. This order has been challenged by the Democratic Party, which argues that it is designed to justify discredited claims of election fraud. The dismissal of this challenge by a judge highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding voting rights and election integrity in the United States. Trump's actions are consistent with a pattern of behavior observed during his previous political engagements, where he has often questioned the legitimacy of electoral processes without substantial evidence.

The classification of this incident as voter suppression is significant. Voter suppression refers to strategies used to influence the outcome of an election by discouraging or preventing specific groups of people from voting. In this context, Trump's order could potentially disenfranchise voters, particularly those from marginalized communities who are often the targets of such suppression tactics. This raises concerns about the fairness and inclusivity of the electoral process, which are foundational to a functioning democracy.

The broader political landscape is deeply affected by such actions. Trump's continued emphasis on discredited election fraud claims undermines public confidence in the electoral system. By promoting these narratives, he contributes to a climate of distrust and division, which can have long-lasting effects on democratic institutions. The dismissal of the Democratic Party's challenge may embolden similar actions in the future, further eroding the integrity of elections.

Why This Matters: The potential consequences of Trump's actions are profound. Voter suppression tactics can lead to decreased voter participation, particularly among minority groups, which skews electoral outcomes and undermines representative democracy. This not only affects the immediate political landscape but also sets a dangerous precedent for future elections. If left unchecked, such behavior could lead to a normalization of anti-democratic practices, threatening the core principles of democratic governance.

The implications for public trust are equally concerning. When political leaders engage in actions that are perceived as undermining electoral integrity, it diminishes citizens' faith in the democratic process. This erosion of trust can lead to increased political polarization and instability, as citizens become more skeptical of the legitimacy of elected officials and institutions. In the broader context, Trump's actions are part of a worrying trend of authoritarianism, where power is consolidated at the expense of democratic norms and civil liberties.

Key Concerning Actions: - Issuance of an order impacting voting systems to suppress voter turnout - Justification of discredited election fraud claims through legal and political maneuvers - Contributing to the erosion of public trust in electoral integrity and democratic institutions

3 months ago

Voter Suppression

Donald Trump

PresidentUS Government

On May 17, 2025, Donald Trump was involved in actions related to voter suppression, as highlighted by a focus on new voting restrictions pursued by the GOP. These restrictions are based on unsubstantiated claims of widespread noncitizen voting, raising significant concerns about their impact on democratic processes.

Detailed Analysis: The primary issue at hand involves the pursuit of new voting restrictions by the GOP, which are reportedly based on false claims of widespread noncitizen voting. This action is part of a broader pattern of voter suppression tactics that have been increasingly employed in recent years. The emphasis on these restrictions, despite a lack of credible evidence supporting the claims of voter fraud, suggests a strategic move to undermine the integrity of the electoral process. Such actions are often classified under voter suppression, as they can disproportionately affect marginalized communities, potentially disenfranchising significant segments of the population.

The involvement of Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) in focusing on voter fraud, as reported, further complicates the situation. The DOJ's role is crucial in maintaining fair and free elections, and its alignment with unverified claims could erode public trust in governmental institutions. This alignment with false narratives not only misleads the public but also diverts attention from genuine electoral issues that need addressing. The use of governmental power to propagate these claims can be seen as an authoritarian tactic, aiming to consolidate power by manipulating electoral outcomes.

The broader political landscape is affected by these actions, as they contribute to a growing trend of undermining democratic norms. The persistence of false claims about voter fraud has been a recurring theme in Trump's political strategy, often used to justify restrictive measures that could skew electoral fairness. This approach not only threatens the foundational principles of democracy but also risks normalizing misinformation as a tool for political gain.

Why This Matters: The potential consequences of these actions are profound, as they threaten to erode democratic norms and public trust in the electoral system. By pursuing voting restrictions based on false claims, there is a risk of disenfranchising voters, particularly those from minority communities who may already face barriers to voting. This could lead to a less representative democracy, where the voices of all citizens are not equally heard or valued.

Moreover, the alignment of the DOJ with these unsubstantiated claims could set a dangerous precedent for future administrations, where governmental institutions are used to support partisan agendas rather than uphold justice and fairness. This erosion of trust in key democratic institutions could have long-lasting effects, potentially leading to increased political polarization and instability.

Key Concerning Actions: - Pursuit of new voting restrictions based on false claims of noncitizen voting. - Involvement of Trump's DOJ in focusing on voter fraud without credible evidence. - Potential disenfranchisement of marginalized communities. - Erosion of public trust in democratic institutions and processes.

3 months ago

Voter Suppression

Ken Paxton

Attorney GeneralTexas Government

On May 7, 2025, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton made headlines with announcements that have raised significant concerns about voter suppression. The articles highlight Paxton's claims of voting fraud, which are seen as a pretext for implementing measures that could potentially disenfranchise voters.

Detailed Analysis: Ken Paxton's announcement regarding voting fraud is a continuation of a pattern seen in recent years where claims of electoral malfeasance are used to justify restrictive voting measures. The concern here is that these claims, often lacking substantial evidence, serve as a foundation for policies that may suppress voter turnout, particularly among marginalized communities. This tactic has been classified under voter suppression, as it potentially undermines the democratic process by making it more difficult for certain groups to exercise their right to vote.

The broader political landscape has seen similar strategies employed, where allegations of fraud are used to erode public confidence in the electoral system. This erosion of trust can lead to decreased voter participation and a questioning of the legitimacy of election outcomes. By perpetuating the narrative of widespread voting fraud, Paxton's actions contribute to a climate of fear and uncertainty, which can deter individuals from participating in elections due to concerns about the integrity of their vote.

This behavior is particularly concerning given the historical context of voter suppression in the United States, where various tactics have been used to disenfranchise minority voters. The implications of such actions are profound, as they not only impact the immediate electoral process but also have long-term effects on public trust in democratic institutions. By framing these measures as necessary to combat fraud, Paxton aligns with a broader trend of authoritarianism, where the guise of security is used to justify the erosion of civil liberties.

Why This Matters: The potential consequences of Ken Paxton's actions are significant. If measures based on unfounded claims of voter fraud are implemented, they could lead to a reduction in voter turnout, particularly among groups that historically face barriers to voting. This undermines the principle of equal representation and can skew election results in favor of those who support such measures. Furthermore, the perpetuation of fraud narratives without substantial evidence can damage public trust in the electoral process, leading to increased polarization and cynicism about the effectiveness of democratic governance.

In the broader context, these actions reflect a troubling pattern where democratic norms are challenged under the pretext of security and integrity. This not only affects the immediate political landscape but also sets a precedent for future actions that could further erode civil rights. The severity of these actions lies in their potential to fundamentally alter the democratic process, making it imperative to critically assess and address such claims and the policies they inspire.

Key Concerning Actions: - Announcing claims of voting fraud without substantial evidence, contributing to voter suppression concerns. - Utilizing fraud narratives to justify potentially disenfranchising voting measures. - Eroding public trust in the electoral process through unsubstantiated claims.